For many, Bal Thackeray is a towering leader and for some, he is a politician with a separatist agenda. But for caricaturist-turned-academic Kokila Kiran Kumar, the ‘Maratha Tiger’ is first a member of his cartoonist fraternity.

Kiran, a native of Tirupati, who bagged a special jury award in the International Caricature Contest, 2010 conducted by the Indian Institute of Cartoonists, expressed his condolence and paid tributes to Thackeray in the form of a cartoon.

The caricature depicts the pipe-smoking Balasaheb in a sombre mood, with the tiger skin forming his forehead, where the black lines resemble a ‘Trishul’, an indication of his Hindu agenda. His spectacles are presented as a butterfly, while his smoking pipe has a pen nib and a painting brush at the tip.

“Tiger skin indicates not just his surname ‘Maratha Tiger’, but also the swiftness with which his mind thinks and reacts. His multi-faceted personality as a critic, editor and cartoonist by profession is shown by the pipe,” he explains.

With the lull of Diwali and Gujarati New Year over, the political scene is finally hotting up in Gujarat. The Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) announced its first list of 84 candidates on Thursday evening, a day after the Congress named 52 nominees for the Assembly elections next month.

Chief Minister Narendra Modi will contest from Maninagar in Ahmedabad city, the constituency from which he has fought the last two Assembly elections. The Congress may field Navnirman leader Umakant Mankad, 62, against Mr. Modi. The popular Navnirman movement had, in the mid-seventies, unseated the then State government over issues of price rise and corruption. Barring a few, the names declared by the BJP on Thursday were those of sitting legislators.

With two days left for filing of nominations, the lists of all parties for the 182-member House will be out soon. Eighty-seven constituencies will go to the polls in the first phase on December 13. The second phase is scheduled for December 17 and the results will be declared on December 20.

The names of the candidates of the former BJP patriarch, Keshubhai Patel’s Gujarat Parivartan Party were expected on Thursday. The party will contest 181 seats, but has identified 20 constituencies which it says it can win, and thus will focus on those during the campaign, sources said.

Rebel BJP MLA Kanu Kalsaria, who had led a major agitation against detergent giant Nirma in the coastal Saurashtra region and got its proposed cement plant stopped by dragging the Narendra Modi government to the Supreme Court, has launched his own outfit and it will contest five seats. Mr. Kalsaria has held talks with Mr. Patel and the Congress on seat sharing to ensure that anti-BJP votes in Saurashtra are not split. There is also an understanding between the Congress and Mr. Patel that candidates selection should be such that “anti-Modi” votes remain intact.

The Congress played it safe, with 26 of the 52 candidates it announced on Wednesday night being sitting legislators, including Leader of the Opposition Shaktisinh Gohil and PCC president Arjun Modhwadia. Eight of the candidates are former MLAs. The party has also fielded sitting Lok Sabha member Kunwarji Bawalia from Botad. The list has 13 candidates from the Scheduled Tribes and four from the Scheduled Castes, while there are four women and two Muslims in the fray.

However, there were protest demonstrations at the Congress headquarters in Ahmedabad over certain candidates in various regions.

The Congress has left 11 seats to its alliance partner, the Nationalist Congress Party, and will contest 171 seats.

There is a common perception that with the changed demographics of constituencies due to delimitation and Mr. Keshubhai Patel banking greatly on his Patel caste, the elections will be fought on the caste plank.

The Congress’ list reflects the party’s weightage given to the caste of the candidates. Keeping this strategy in mind, the party is trying to convince the former BJP veteran, Shankersinh Vaghela, to contest the elections, though he is reportedly unwilling and would rather devote his energies as the Congress campaign committee chairman.

Mr. Vaghela has a Statewide following among Kshatriyas and the OBCs and the party leaders believe that he could galvanise these castes in favour of the Congress.

Sources said the BJP, too, would give adequate attention to the caste of the candidates, instead of just banking on the development plank and Mr. Modi’s popularity.

Meanwhile, the bad news for the Congress is that the Samajwadi Party and the Bahujan Samaj Party, which are fielding candidates, could cut into its vote. Though the impact would be marginal, given that these parties do not have any network in Gujarat, in an election as close as this even a few votes would count.

In the rival camp, it bodes well for the BJP that the Shiv Sena, which contested a few seats in the 2007 elections, would desist from doing so this time.


Rising for the third day in a row, the BSE benchmark Sensex gained over 32 points in early trade on Friday on sustained buying by funds and retailers on hopes of economic reforms amid a firming trend in Asian region.

The 30—share barometer, which had gained over 188 points in the previous two sessions, added 32.17 points, or 0.17 per cent, to 18,549.51 with stocks of power, capital goods, metal and oil and gas sectors extending support.

Similarly, the wide-based National Stock Exchange index Nifty moved up by 6.80 points, or 0.12 per cent, to 5,634.55.

Brokers said trading sentiment remained firm on continued buying by funds and retail investors largely on hopes that the government will take more reform measures amid a firming trend in the Asian region in line with overnight gains on the European markets.

Stocks of Hindustan Copper, which had rallied by 11.33 per cent in yesterday’s trade after the government announced plans to divest 4 per cent equity in the company, came under selling pressure and plunged over 16 per cent to Rs 223.55.

In the Asian region, Hong Kong’s Hang Seng rose by 0.40 per cent, while Japanese markets closed for a public holiday.

The US markets remained closed on Thursday for ‘Thanksgiving’


KOLKATA: Rajeev Shenoy, a Bangalore-based techie (not his real name), splurged nearly Rs46K on his sleek iPhone 5 to experience 4G on-the-go. But his thrill turned to bitterness when he found out his fancy smartphone won’t run on fourth generation networks in India.

The reason: Apple’s new smartphone does not support the TDD or ‘time division duplex’ version of LTE technology that powers 4G networks in India, but runs on its older and more globally trusted variant, FDD or ‘frequency duplex division’, deployed by most 4G operators in the US and Europe. As a result, the iPhone 5 supports LTE or ‘long term evolution’ technology only on the 1.8 GHz band and not on the 2300 MHz band frequencies auctioned in India two years ago.

Varsha Saxena, a graphic artist in Kolkata (again not her real name), suffered a similar fate with her iPad 3 tablet, which supports LTE only on the super efficient 700 MHz band that won’t be available in India for at least another two years. Rajeev and Varsha are on Rs 1999 LTE data plans from Bharti Airtel, the country’s leading mobile carrier and sole LTE operator yet.

Far from being stray cases, they represent the first wave of data-hungry customers who signed up for 4G thrills like video conferencing, interactive gaming, streaming HD movies to making video calls on the move. But, instead, they learnt the hard way that “true bang for the LTE buck” remains a pipedream in a country where 4G services arrived seven months ago.

To be precise, LTE is only nearly 4G. True 4G will arrive only with LTE Advanced. But LTE itself brings with it enormous benefits. It has high spectral efficiency and low latency. It offers lower costs for every megabyte transmitted, high throughput and backward compatibility with existing CDMA technologies. Operators can provide voice-over LTE as well, but the one of the best advantages is in operational efficiency.

Small-cell LTE is nearly-impossible to manage without self-organising networks, which improves operational efficiency. But the march to this ideal state is long and with several hurdles on the way. All buzz about 4G data speeds being at least five times faster than 3G hasn’t really translated into mass LTE adoption levels in India. 4G subscriber growth has failed to happen accentuated by a near non-existent devices ecosystem.

LTE has mind-boggling opportunities but it faces substantial hurdles now, like absence of compatible 4G handsets, pricey data plans, expensive dongles and customer premise equipment — both priced over $92 (Rs 4,999). Paucity of 4G-centric applications, content and services coupled with limited coverage haven’t helped either. Another turn-off undermining 4G experience, claim the users, is the drastic speed rollback from a normal 40 Mbps to a paltry 128 kbps once a customer exhausts his monthly quota of free gigabytes.

The company’s president (consumer business) K Srinivas is quick to stress that it “takes several years for a new mobile broadband technology like TDD-LTE to mature just like 3G took years to gain traction in western markets,” but concedes Airtel’s fledgling 4G operation won’t gain momentum unless it launches LTE in Mumbai and Delhi where it acquired Qualcomm’s wireless broadband permits earlier this year.

Right now, it offers 4G services only in Bangalore, Kolkata and Pune. “Mumbai and Delhi are the two largest data markets and our network teams are working furiously to roll out 4G in both cities at the earliest,” says Srinivas declining to reveal potential launch timelines.

The company, along with China’s Huawei, is also conducting trials of the Huawei-Ascend P1 LTE smartphone, the first TD-LTE-compatible 4G handset in India. However, it is yet to take a call on its pricing. Apple refused to comment on the feature.

“I don’t expect 4G to see any meaningful traction unless Airtel launches the service in high-value markets like Mumbai and Delhi, and more important, till Reliance-owned Infotel Broadband launches,” says consultancy Ovum’s principal telecoms analyst (emerging markets), Shiv Putcha.

Infotel Broadband is the only firm with a pan-India broadband wireless access permit, which allows it to offer high-speed data services on mobile devices. Small wonder, most analysts believe the new telecom policy 2012 (aka NTP 2012) paves the way for Infotel to eventually offer voice services (read: VoIP) over data networks, which they claim, can be a proverbial gamechanger for LTE adoption.

“Infotel Broadband could disrupt established telecom businesses if it can offer cheap VoIP and data services over converged, smart devices,” says Putcha adding that “voice could well be the sweetner in an LTE scenario since there “are no successful cases of data-only telecom businesses worldwide”.

Analysts at Forrester agree Reliance’s 4G service could be a potential gamechanger but say VoIP won’t play a huge part. “Infotel can transform India’s LTE space but not due to VoIP. Apart from some advances by South Korea, ‘VoIP over 4G’ is still at a nascent stage globally and call quality remains poor,” says Katyayan Gupta, analyst & connectivity lead (Asia-Pacific & Japan) at Forrester.

Gupta believes Reliance’s comparative 4G edge lies in the ability to build better economies of scale by offering a pan-India service, attracting more customers by offering nationwide 4G roaming – since NTP 2012 has abolished roaming — and even subsidising 4G devices like CPEs and dongles by leveraging scale.

Industry experts aware of developments claim Reliance has approached the telecom department to conduct VoIP trials on its TDD-LTE network in the run up to launching 4G services in Mumbai and Delhi, but Reliance did not reply to ET’s specific queries. The company is also tight-lipped on the launch of its 4G services originally expected in June.

Former VSNL chairman BK Syngal, who is now senior principal at Dua Consulting, says Reliance-controlled Infotel Broadband may not be able to immediately offer VoIP services on a 4G data network. “Reliance only has an ISP licence which allowed it to acquire BWA airwaves to provide data services nationally.

He also believes it is early days for TDD-LTE tech since the device ecosystem on this platform trails the more evolved FDD version and mass adoption in India could be nearlythree years away.

Ovum’s Putcha and Forrester’s Gupta believe mass TDD-LTE adoption may not take that long given the surge in global industry support for this version. “Network vendors may be more focused on FDD now but chipset vendors are rapidly developing dual-mode chips that support both TDD and FDD variants of LTE,” says Gupta adding that TDD shares most of the FDD designs and standards and uses a common core network, which is why, the world’s top network gear vendors like Nokia Siemens Network and Huawei to chipset vendors like Qualcomm, Samsung and Broadcom are supporting the TDD-LTE platform.

Bharti Airtel’s Srinivas seconds this claiming over 100 global telecom carriers are currently at various stages of deploying TDD-LTE, even though the total number of 4G operators backing FDD worldwide exceeds 400. In fact, the seeds of the LTE ecosystem were sown when Airtel teamed up with some of the biggest TDD-LTE backers like Japan’s Softbank Mobile and China Mobile at the 2011 Mobile World Congress in Barcelona to launch the Global TD-LTE Initiative (GTI).

User number potential are not insignificant either. Ovum expects India to have 37 million TDD-LTE subscribers by 2017 while Forrester pegs it at nearly 50 million by 2018.

Spectrum availability remains a concern though. Airtel’s Srinivas declines to confirm whether the firm would put all LTE expansions on hold till the government auctions airwaves in the 700 MHz band considered thrice more efficient than the 2300 MHz frequencies auctioned in 2010. Forrester’s Gupta feels stalling expansion or rollout plans may be a dumb thing to do since Airtel “cannot sit on licensed spectrum for too long as it would be unwise not to lock customers before Reliance launches.”

Most stakeholders also believe an evolved TD-LTE ecosystem opens up efficient multi-network management scenarios, in that, it can be an enabler of ‘self-organising networks’ or SONs.

“Self-organising networks are likely to be a hit with telcos in India, especially since many domestic carriers may soon be managing multiple technology networks in the forseeable future,” says Gupta of Forrester.

Inspirers me

Posted: November 17, 2012 in Trending

Posted: November 17, 2012 in Trending

Samsung Galaxy S3 vs iPhone 5

When Apple revealed the iPhone 5 everyone naturally compared the handset to the Samsung Galaxy S3. People compared the cameras of the devices, their displays and browsing speeds. The iPhone 5 is packed with amazing hardware, and in benchmark tests it has beaten the Galaxy S3 a couple of times as well which is a first for iPhone vs Galaxy S battles. However despite this the Samsung Galaxy S3 still appears to be selling better than ever. In fact, Samsung said that when Apple launched the iPhone 5, the Galaxy S3 enjoyed 4 out of its 5 best-selling weeks. The device has sold more than 30 million units already, has beaten the iPhone 4S as the top selling smartphone of 2012, and is currently the most popular handset in the UK (iPhone 5 comes in second place and S3 third). So just what gives…

View original post 551 more words

5 hot smartphones under Rs 20,000.


Planning to buy a new phone soon but confused by all the technical jargon and the number of smartphones available in the market today? Worry not. If you are looking to purchase a swanky new sub-Rs 20,000 smartphone, then look no further. We have compiled a list of five hot smartphones available in India today that cost less than Rs 20,000 and have all the latest features.

LG Optimus L7 – Rs 15,529

The LG Optimus L7 can be purchased for Rs 18,990 and sports a 4.3-inch display with a 480×800 pixels resolution. The smartphone is powered by a 1GHz Cortex A5 processor running Android 4.0 Ice Cream Sandwich and has a 5-megapixel rear camera with autofocus and LED flash and a front-facing VGA camera.

With thickness of just 8.7mm thick. Other features include Wi-Fi and 3G connectivity, Bluetooth 3.0, Wi-Fi Direct, DLNA and a-GPS. It includes 512MB of RAM and comes with 4GB of internal memory. It can be expanded up to 32GB via a microSD card. It includes a 1700 mAh battery.

Nokia Lumia 800 – Rs 17,799

The Windows Phone 7.5-powered Lumia 800, from the house of Nokia, comes at Rs 17,799. The smartphone sports a 3.7-inch ClearBlack display and is powered by a 1.4 GHz Qualcomm Snapdragon processor. It has 16GB of built-in storage but does not support microSD card for expandable storage. Connectivity features in the device include 2G, 3G, Wi-Fi, Bluetooth 2.1 and microUSB.

Motorola Atrix 2 – Rs 17,999

This device runs on Android 4.0 (Ice Cream Sandwich) and is powered by a dual-core OMAP processor clocked at 1GHz is now available at Rs 17,999. The Motorola Atrix 2 sports a 4.3-inch qHD display with Gorilla Glass protection, it includes 1GB RAM and 8GB of built-in storage, along with support for 32GB expandable memory via microSD card.

Atrix 2 has an 8-megapixel rear camera with 1080p video recording, a secondary front facing camera with VGA quality, and includes a 1,735 mAh battery which is rated for up to 8 hours, 50 mins of talktime.

Sony Xperia J – Rs 18,399

Sony Xperia J sports a 4-inch touchscreen of 480 x 854 resolution, sheathed by a scratch resistant gorilla glass display. It is powered by a 1GHz Qualcomm MSM7227A Snapdragon processor with 512MB of RAM and 4GB internal memory (usable up to 2GB only). It comes with pre-installed Android 4.0 (Ice Cream Sandwich) and it will receive and is scheduled to receive Android 4.1 (Jelly Bean) update in 2013.

The phone’s memory is expandable up to 32GB via the microSD slot available and has a powerful 1,750mAh battery which will provide you with a talk-time of up to 7hours (3G).

HTC Desire X – Rs 19,799

This is an Android 4.0 (Ice Cream Sandwich) based device powered by a 1GHz dual-core Snapdragon S4 processor, coupled with 768MB of RAM. Additionally, it includes 4GB of built-in storage capacity, a microSD card for expandable storage and a 1,650 mAh battery.

The HTC Desire X is equipped with a 5-megapixel rear camera with autofocus, f/2.0 aperture, 28mm wide angle lens, BSI sensor and LED flash. It does not include a front facing camera, unlike most of the new Android smartphones.

The device has been up for grabs at a best buy price of Rs 19,799.


SAN FRANCISCO: When Apple Inc and HTC Corp last week ended their worldwide legal battles with a 10-year patent licensing agreement, they declined to answer a critical question: whether all of Apple’s patents were covered by the deal.

It’s an enormously important issue for the broader smartphone patent wars. If all the Apple patents are included -including the “user experience” patents that the company has previously insisted it would not license – it could undermine the iPhone makers efforts to permanently ban the sale of products that copy its technology.

Samsung Electronics Co Ltd, which could face such a sales ban following a crushing jury verdict against it in August, now plans to ask a US judge to force Apple to turn over a copy of the HTC agreement, according to a court filing on Friday.

Representatives for Apple and Samsung could not immediately be reached for comment.

Judges are reluctant to block the sale of products if the dispute can be resolved via a licensing agreement. To secure an injunction against Samsung, Apple must show the copying of its technology caused irreparable harm and that money, by itself, is an inadequate remedy.

Ron Laurie, managing director of Inflexion Point Strategy and a veteran IP lawyer, said he found it very unlikely that HTC would agree to a settlement that did not include all the patents.

If the deal did in fact include everything, Laurie and other legal experts said that would represent a very clear signal that Apple under CEO Tim Cook was taking a much different approach to patent issues than his predecessor, Steve Jobs.

Apple first sued HTC in March 2010, and has been litigating for more than two years against handset manufacturers who use Google’s Android operating system.

Apple co-founder Jobs promised to go “thermonuclear” on Android, and that threat has manifested in Apple’s repeated bids for court-imposed bans on the sale of its rivals’ phones.

Cook, on the other hand, has said he prefers to settle rather than litigate, if the terms are reasonable. But prior to this month, Apple showed little willingness to license its patents to an Android maker.

Holy patents
In August, a Northern California jury handed Apple a $1.05 billion verdict, finding that Samsung’s phones violated a series of Apple’s software and design patents.

Apple quickly asked US District Judge Lucy Koh to impose a permanent sales ban on those Samsung phones, and a hearing is scheduled for next month in San Jose, California.

In a surprise announcement on Saturday, however, Apple and HTC announced a license agreement covering “current and future patents” at both companies. Specific terms are unknown, though analysts have speculated that HTC will pay Apple somewhere between $5 and $10 per phone.

During the Samsung trial, Apple IP chief Boris Teksler said the company is generally willing to license many of its patents – except for those that cover what he called Apple’s “unique user experience” like touchscreen functionality and design.

However, Teksler acknowledged that Apple has, on a few occasions, licensed those holy patents – most notably to Microsoft, which signed an anti-cloning agreement as part of the deal.

In opposing Apple’s injunction request last month, Samsung said Apple’s willingness to license at all shows money should be sufficient compensation, court documents show.

Apple has already licensed at least one of the prized patents in the Samsung case to both Nokia and IBM . That fact was confidential until late last year, when the court mistakenly released a ruling with details that should have been hidden from public view.

In a court filing last week, Apple argued that its Nokia, IBM and Microsoft deals shouldn’t stand in the way of an injunction. Microsoft’s license only covers Apple patents filed before 2002, and IBM signed several years before the iPhone launched, according to Apple.

“IBM’s agreement is a cross license with a party that does not market smartphones,” Apple wrote.

Apple’s seeming shift away from Jobs-style war, and toward licensing, may also reflect a realization that injunctions have become harder to obtain for a variety of reasons.

Colleen Chien, a professor at Santa Clara Law in Silicon Valley, said an appellate ruling last month that tossed Apple’s pretrial injunction against the Samsung Nexus phone raised the legal standard for everyone.

“The ability of technology companies to get injunctions on big products based on small inventions, unless the inventions drive consumer’s demand, has been whittled away significantly,” Chien said.

The case in US District Court, Northern District of California is Apple Inc v. Samsung Electronics Co Ltd et al, 11-1846.