Posts Tagged ‘technology’


KOLKATA: Rajeev Shenoy, a Bangalore-based techie (not his real name), splurged nearly Rs46K on his sleek iPhone 5 to experience 4G on-the-go. But his thrill turned to bitterness when he found out his fancy smartphone won’t run on fourth generation networks in India.

The reason: Apple’s new smartphone does not support the TDD or ‘time division duplex’ version of LTE technology that powers 4G networks in India, but runs on its older and more globally trusted variant, FDD or ‘frequency duplex division’, deployed by most 4G operators in the US and Europe. As a result, the iPhone 5 supports LTE or ‘long term evolution’ technology only on the 1.8 GHz band and not on the 2300 MHz band frequencies auctioned in India two years ago.

Varsha Saxena, a graphic artist in Kolkata (again not her real name), suffered a similar fate with her iPad 3 tablet, which supports LTE only on the super efficient 700 MHz band that won’t be available in India for at least another two years. Rajeev and Varsha are on Rs 1999 LTE data plans from Bharti Airtel, the country’s leading mobile carrier and sole LTE operator yet.

Far from being stray cases, they represent the first wave of data-hungry customers who signed up for 4G thrills like video conferencing, interactive gaming, streaming HD movies to making video calls on the move. But, instead, they learnt the hard way that “true bang for the LTE buck” remains a pipedream in a country where 4G services arrived seven months ago.

To be precise, LTE is only nearly 4G. True 4G will arrive only with LTE Advanced. But LTE itself brings with it enormous benefits. It has high spectral efficiency and low latency. It offers lower costs for every megabyte transmitted, high throughput and backward compatibility with existing CDMA technologies. Operators can provide voice-over LTE as well, but the one of the best advantages is in operational efficiency.

Small-cell LTE is nearly-impossible to manage without self-organising networks, which improves operational efficiency. But the march to this ideal state is long and with several hurdles on the way. All buzz about 4G data speeds being at least five times faster than 3G hasn’t really translated into mass LTE adoption levels in India. 4G subscriber growth has failed to happen accentuated by a near non-existent devices ecosystem.

LTE has mind-boggling opportunities but it faces substantial hurdles now, like absence of compatible 4G handsets, pricey data plans, expensive dongles and customer premise equipment — both priced over $92 (Rs 4,999). Paucity of 4G-centric applications, content and services coupled with limited coverage haven’t helped either. Another turn-off undermining 4G experience, claim the users, is the drastic speed rollback from a normal 40 Mbps to a paltry 128 kbps once a customer exhausts his monthly quota of free gigabytes.

The company’s president (consumer business) K Srinivas is quick to stress that it “takes several years for a new mobile broadband technology like TDD-LTE to mature just like 3G took years to gain traction in western markets,” but concedes Airtel’s fledgling 4G operation won’t gain momentum unless it launches LTE in Mumbai and Delhi where it acquired Qualcomm’s wireless broadband permits earlier this year.

Right now, it offers 4G services only in Bangalore, Kolkata and Pune. “Mumbai and Delhi are the two largest data markets and our network teams are working furiously to roll out 4G in both cities at the earliest,” says Srinivas declining to reveal potential launch timelines.

The company, along with China’s Huawei, is also conducting trials of the Huawei-Ascend P1 LTE smartphone, the first TD-LTE-compatible 4G handset in India. However, it is yet to take a call on its pricing. Apple refused to comment on the feature.

“I don’t expect 4G to see any meaningful traction unless Airtel launches the service in high-value markets like Mumbai and Delhi, and more important, till Reliance-owned Infotel Broadband launches,” says consultancy Ovum’s principal telecoms analyst (emerging markets), Shiv Putcha.

Infotel Broadband is the only firm with a pan-India broadband wireless access permit, which allows it to offer high-speed data services on mobile devices. Small wonder, most analysts believe the new telecom policy 2012 (aka NTP 2012) paves the way for Infotel to eventually offer voice services (read: VoIP) over data networks, which they claim, can be a proverbial gamechanger for LTE adoption.

“Infotel Broadband could disrupt established telecom businesses if it can offer cheap VoIP and data services over converged, smart devices,” says Putcha adding that “voice could well be the sweetner in an LTE scenario since there “are no successful cases of data-only telecom businesses worldwide”.

Analysts at Forrester agree Reliance’s 4G service could be a potential gamechanger but say VoIP won’t play a huge part. “Infotel can transform India’s LTE space but not due to VoIP. Apart from some advances by South Korea, ‘VoIP over 4G’ is still at a nascent stage globally and call quality remains poor,” says Katyayan Gupta, analyst & connectivity lead (Asia-Pacific & Japan) at Forrester.

Gupta believes Reliance’s comparative 4G edge lies in the ability to build better economies of scale by offering a pan-India service, attracting more customers by offering nationwide 4G roaming – since NTP 2012 has abolished roaming — and even subsidising 4G devices like CPEs and dongles by leveraging scale.

Industry experts aware of developments claim Reliance has approached the telecom department to conduct VoIP trials on its TDD-LTE network in the run up to launching 4G services in Mumbai and Delhi, but Reliance did not reply to ET’s specific queries. The company is also tight-lipped on the launch of its 4G services originally expected in June.

Former VSNL chairman BK Syngal, who is now senior principal at Dua Consulting, says Reliance-controlled Infotel Broadband may not be able to immediately offer VoIP services on a 4G data network. “Reliance only has an ISP licence which allowed it to acquire BWA airwaves to provide data services nationally.

He also believes it is early days for TDD-LTE tech since the device ecosystem on this platform trails the more evolved FDD version and mass adoption in India could be nearlythree years away.

Ovum’s Putcha and Forrester’s Gupta believe mass TDD-LTE adoption may not take that long given the surge in global industry support for this version. “Network vendors may be more focused on FDD now but chipset vendors are rapidly developing dual-mode chips that support both TDD and FDD variants of LTE,” says Gupta adding that TDD shares most of the FDD designs and standards and uses a common core network, which is why, the world’s top network gear vendors like Nokia Siemens Network and Huawei to chipset vendors like Qualcomm, Samsung and Broadcom are supporting the TDD-LTE platform.

Bharti Airtel’s Srinivas seconds this claiming over 100 global telecom carriers are currently at various stages of deploying TDD-LTE, even though the total number of 4G operators backing FDD worldwide exceeds 400. In fact, the seeds of the LTE ecosystem were sown when Airtel teamed up with some of the biggest TDD-LTE backers like Japan’s Softbank Mobile and China Mobile at the 2011 Mobile World Congress in Barcelona to launch the Global TD-LTE Initiative (GTI).

User number potential are not insignificant either. Ovum expects India to have 37 million TDD-LTE subscribers by 2017 while Forrester pegs it at nearly 50 million by 2018.

Spectrum availability remains a concern though. Airtel’s Srinivas declines to confirm whether the firm would put all LTE expansions on hold till the government auctions airwaves in the 700 MHz band considered thrice more efficient than the 2300 MHz frequencies auctioned in 2010. Forrester’s Gupta feels stalling expansion or rollout plans may be a dumb thing to do since Airtel “cannot sit on licensed spectrum for too long as it would be unwise not to lock customers before Reliance launches.”

Most stakeholders also believe an evolved TD-LTE ecosystem opens up efficient multi-network management scenarios, in that, it can be an enabler of ‘self-organising networks’ or SONs.

“Self-organising networks are likely to be a hit with telcos in India, especially since many domestic carriers may soon be managing multiple technology networks in the forseeable future,” says Gupta of Forrester.

5 hot smartphones under Rs 20,000.


Planning to buy a new phone soon but confused by all the technical jargon and the number of smartphones available in the market today? Worry not. If you are looking to purchase a swanky new sub-Rs 20,000 smartphone, then look no further. We have compiled a list of five hot smartphones available in India today that cost less than Rs 20,000 and have all the latest features.

LG Optimus L7 – Rs 15,529

The LG Optimus L7 can be purchased for Rs 18,990 and sports a 4.3-inch display with a 480×800 pixels resolution. The smartphone is powered by a 1GHz Cortex A5 processor running Android 4.0 Ice Cream Sandwich and has a 5-megapixel rear camera with autofocus and LED flash and a front-facing VGA camera.

With thickness of just 8.7mm thick. Other features include Wi-Fi and 3G connectivity, Bluetooth 3.0, Wi-Fi Direct, DLNA and a-GPS. It includes 512MB of RAM and comes with 4GB of internal memory. It can be expanded up to 32GB via a microSD card. It includes a 1700 mAh battery.

Nokia Lumia 800 – Rs 17,799

The Windows Phone 7.5-powered Lumia 800, from the house of Nokia, comes at Rs 17,799. The smartphone sports a 3.7-inch ClearBlack display and is powered by a 1.4 GHz Qualcomm Snapdragon processor. It has 16GB of built-in storage but does not support microSD card for expandable storage. Connectivity features in the device include 2G, 3G, Wi-Fi, Bluetooth 2.1 and microUSB.

Motorola Atrix 2 – Rs 17,999

This device runs on Android 4.0 (Ice Cream Sandwich) and is powered by a dual-core OMAP processor clocked at 1GHz is now available at Rs 17,999. The Motorola Atrix 2 sports a 4.3-inch qHD display with Gorilla Glass protection, it includes 1GB RAM and 8GB of built-in storage, along with support for 32GB expandable memory via microSD card.

Atrix 2 has an 8-megapixel rear camera with 1080p video recording, a secondary front facing camera with VGA quality, and includes a 1,735 mAh battery which is rated for up to 8 hours, 50 mins of talktime.

Sony Xperia J – Rs 18,399

Sony Xperia J sports a 4-inch touchscreen of 480 x 854 resolution, sheathed by a scratch resistant gorilla glass display. It is powered by a 1GHz Qualcomm MSM7227A Snapdragon processor with 512MB of RAM and 4GB internal memory (usable up to 2GB only). It comes with pre-installed Android 4.0 (Ice Cream Sandwich) and it will receive and is scheduled to receive Android 4.1 (Jelly Bean) update in 2013.

The phone’s memory is expandable up to 32GB via the microSD slot available and has a powerful 1,750mAh battery which will provide you with a talk-time of up to 7hours (3G).

HTC Desire X – Rs 19,799

This is an Android 4.0 (Ice Cream Sandwich) based device powered by a 1GHz dual-core Snapdragon S4 processor, coupled with 768MB of RAM. Additionally, it includes 4GB of built-in storage capacity, a microSD card for expandable storage and a 1,650 mAh battery.

The HTC Desire X is equipped with a 5-megapixel rear camera with autofocus, f/2.0 aperture, 28mm wide angle lens, BSI sensor and LED flash. It does not include a front facing camera, unlike most of the new Android smartphones.

The device has been up for grabs at a best buy price of Rs 19,799.


SAN FRANCISCO: When Apple Inc and HTC Corp last week ended their worldwide legal battles with a 10-year patent licensing agreement, they declined to answer a critical question: whether all of Apple’s patents were covered by the deal.

It’s an enormously important issue for the broader smartphone patent wars. If all the Apple patents are included -including the “user experience” patents that the company has previously insisted it would not license – it could undermine the iPhone makers efforts to permanently ban the sale of products that copy its technology.

Samsung Electronics Co Ltd, which could face such a sales ban following a crushing jury verdict against it in August, now plans to ask a US judge to force Apple to turn over a copy of the HTC agreement, according to a court filing on Friday.

Representatives for Apple and Samsung could not immediately be reached for comment.

Judges are reluctant to block the sale of products if the dispute can be resolved via a licensing agreement. To secure an injunction against Samsung, Apple must show the copying of its technology caused irreparable harm and that money, by itself, is an inadequate remedy.

Ron Laurie, managing director of Inflexion Point Strategy and a veteran IP lawyer, said he found it very unlikely that HTC would agree to a settlement that did not include all the patents.

If the deal did in fact include everything, Laurie and other legal experts said that would represent a very clear signal that Apple under CEO Tim Cook was taking a much different approach to patent issues than his predecessor, Steve Jobs.

Apple first sued HTC in March 2010, and has been litigating for more than two years against handset manufacturers who use Google’s Android operating system.

Apple co-founder Jobs promised to go “thermonuclear” on Android, and that threat has manifested in Apple’s repeated bids for court-imposed bans on the sale of its rivals’ phones.

Cook, on the other hand, has said he prefers to settle rather than litigate, if the terms are reasonable. But prior to this month, Apple showed little willingness to license its patents to an Android maker.

Holy patents
In August, a Northern California jury handed Apple a $1.05 billion verdict, finding that Samsung’s phones violated a series of Apple’s software and design patents.

Apple quickly asked US District Judge Lucy Koh to impose a permanent sales ban on those Samsung phones, and a hearing is scheduled for next month in San Jose, California.

In a surprise announcement on Saturday, however, Apple and HTC announced a license agreement covering “current and future patents” at both companies. Specific terms are unknown, though analysts have speculated that HTC will pay Apple somewhere between $5 and $10 per phone.

During the Samsung trial, Apple IP chief Boris Teksler said the company is generally willing to license many of its patents – except for those that cover what he called Apple’s “unique user experience” like touchscreen functionality and design.

However, Teksler acknowledged that Apple has, on a few occasions, licensed those holy patents – most notably to Microsoft, which signed an anti-cloning agreement as part of the deal.

In opposing Apple’s injunction request last month, Samsung said Apple’s willingness to license at all shows money should be sufficient compensation, court documents show.

Apple has already licensed at least one of the prized patents in the Samsung case to both Nokia and IBM . That fact was confidential until late last year, when the court mistakenly released a ruling with details that should have been hidden from public view.

In a court filing last week, Apple argued that its Nokia, IBM and Microsoft deals shouldn’t stand in the way of an injunction. Microsoft’s license only covers Apple patents filed before 2002, and IBM signed several years before the iPhone launched, according to Apple.

“IBM’s agreement is a cross license with a party that does not market smartphones,” Apple wrote.

Apple’s seeming shift away from Jobs-style war, and toward licensing, may also reflect a realization that injunctions have become harder to obtain for a variety of reasons.

Colleen Chien, a professor at Santa Clara Law in Silicon Valley, said an appellate ruling last month that tossed Apple’s pretrial injunction against the Samsung Nexus phone raised the legal standard for everyone.

“The ability of technology companies to get injunctions on big products based on small inventions, unless the inventions drive consumer’s demand, has been whittled away significantly,” Chien said.

The case in US District Court, Northern District of California is Apple Inc v. Samsung Electronics Co Ltd et al, 11-1846.


he good: The Samsung Chromebook is a lightweight, thin, and inexpensive laptop for those times when all you need is a powerful browser.
The bad: The Chromebook’s low price comes out in its build quality and performance.
The bottom line: The $249 Samsung Chromebook is a good extra computer for cloud-loving Google-centric Web users.
With Google Chromebooks, price really does make all the difference. (more…)


Amazon began shipping its 8.9-inch Kindle Fire HD on Thursday, ahead of its original planned schedule. The specs and price point of the device are interesting enough that it will certainly make some inroads in the tablet market: Among other features, it sports a front-facing HD camera, 16-GB or 32-GB storage options, and 10 hours of battery life.

The 16-GB model is priced at US$299 and the 32 GB at $369. Later this month, an LTE option will ship for $500.
Content Is King

Amazon is lucky among tablet makers, of course, in that its primary goal is not necessarily to make much — or even any — profit from hardware sales. Its interest lies in the anticipated revenue stream from content users buy or rent to consume on the device.

This approach to the market allows Amazon to try just about anything it thinks will meet market demand. Whether it will or not — try anything, that is — is a matter of debate.

The Full-Sized Tablet Market

The 8.9-inch form factor was a bet Amazon had to make if it wanted to go head-to-head with Apple’s full-sized iPad, and it exhibited some confidence going into this venture.

“What few know is that while the larger and more expensive Kindle didn’t sell as well as the original size, the users were far more active and loyal,” Rob Enderle, principal of the Enderle Group, told the E-Commerce Times. “Keeping your most loyal users happy is a good strategy for any vendor.”

The 8.9-inch model completes Amazon’s line of Fire tablets and Paperwhite e-readers, and Amazon will expand into other areas only if this model moves well, he predicted.

“They aren’t interested in becoming a generic device maker — at least not at the moment,” Enderle said.

Competing With the Surface

However, Amazon is interested in taking down its competition, which now includes Microsoft’s Surface tablet.

As it continues to compete with the iPad — and now the Surface as well — Amazon could find itself focusing more on expensive, high-end hardware.

The head of Amazon’s Kindle division, Mike Nash, spent 20 years at Microsoft, noted Laura DiDio, principal of ITIC. “He is a very savvy marketer who has worked on many different projects at Microsoft. I don’t think Amazon has fully leveraged his expertise — not yet, at least. There is more to come from him.”

Amazon’s next move will be to take on the Surface with a more full-featured product, she predicted.

“Amazon seems to be watching and trying to improve on both Apple and Microsoft,” observed DiDio. “They are saying to consumers, ‘we can innovate too, and we can do it at a lower price.'”

That’s All, Folks

Then again, Amazon might be hesitant to stray far from its content-oriented business model.

“While the Kindle is clearly a media consumption device, Microsoft is positioning the Surface more as a general- purpose computing platform that supports well-known productivity apps,” Charles King, principal of Pund-IT, told the E-Commerce Times.

“Frankly, I don’t think Amazon is capable of playing that angle unless it has something up its sleeve in apps,” he said.

“Google is a much clearer opponent of the Surface in this sense, given the strength of its Docs, Calendar, Gmail, and other services — let along the size of the Android app market,” King pointed out.

Amazon also must consider that other vendors are attempting to make content plays, Azita Arvani of the Arvani Group told the E-Commerce Times.

“The competition has changed on the content side of the tablet market,” she said. “Apple, Amazon and Google are all trying to not just sell devices, but use the devices as a conduit to sell other digital goods.”


The Indian government made the second largest demand for Web user information — next only to the United States government — to Google in the six-month period from January to June this year, according to the ‘Transparency Report’ published by the Web services major on Tuesday.

During the six-month period, the Indian government — both by way of court orders and by way of requests from police— requested Google to disclose user information 2,319 times over 3,467 users/accounts. Google fully or partially complied with the request to the tune of 64 per cent. Only the U.S. government requested more data during the period — 7,969 requests over 16,281 accounts, compliance rate: 90 per cent.

It is the sixth time Google has brought out the bi-annual report detailing its interactions with the world government agencies. It details two categories of interactions : requests to divulge user data; and requests to pull down content. India ranked seventh in the list of requests to pull down data; experts say that the possible reason could be the government not having such powers under the Constitution.

Pranesh Prakash, policy director with Bangalore-based Centre for Internet and Society, said that the Google report was a damning indictment of the country’s government exceeding its constitutional bounds by demanding removal of material for defamation, government criticism, etc., without a valid court order. “There are no laws in our country that allows the executive or the police to remove such material without a court order.”

Substantial spike

In all, 33 countries figure in the report. There was a substantial spike when compared to previous reports with respect to the number of requests from various governments to pull down content.

“In the first half of 2012, there were 20,938 inquiries from government entities around the world. Those requests were for information about 36,614 accounts,” wrote Dorothy Chou, Google’s senior policy analyst, on the Official Google Blog while presenting the report. “The number of government requests to remove content from our services was largely flat from 2009 to 2011. But it’s spiked in this reporting period. In the first half of 2012, there were 1,791 requests from government officials around the world to remove 17,746 pieces of content.”

Google is leading the cause for voluntary disclosure of the interactions it has with the governments. Other web services that put out similar transparency reports include micro-blogging site Twitter; cloud storage service Dropbox; and social networking site Linkedin.

Mr. Prakash said it was not enough if just the web services put out such reports. “The telecom service providers must voluntarily come out with such information,” he added.

“There is a dearth of public information about the amount of legal interception and surveillance. This does not bode well in a democratic polity.”


So, it seems that Google has yet again struggled to launch hardware into the world. We thought that the web giant would have been over this by now what with the poor launch of the Nexus 7 but it seems like the launch of the Nexus 4 and the Nexus 10 were too much for their serves. All over Google+ we’ve been hearing word that the Play Store was an absolute mess when trying to order a device and some of our own writers have experienced this. It looks like the Nexus 4 is now completely sold out, both the 8GB and the 16GB models sold out in under 30 minutes. Which raises a whole lot of questions…

Did Google Not Think the Nexus 4 Was In Demand?
I don’t want to go off on a tangent here but did Google really not have any idea of how popular a phone of this caliber at this price point was going to be? From the way the Play Store was geared up to handle orders today it was as if the Search Giant thought they had a loser on their hands. The Play Store has been nothing but a mess of server errors, inane Google Wallet egg-timers and general confusion. Of course things are going to be a little wonky when it comes to a new product launch but, really Google? This was the best you could do on the day your flagship device went live? Historically the Nexus program has never done that well when it comes to sales – there’s a reason we never see number of Nexus phones – but how can they not see that at that price, for that phone people were going to go crazy over it?

Had Google Done Anything to Prepare the Play Store for This?
It looks like Google didn’t do much at all to help bolster the Play Store’s defences when it comes to the sheer amount of traffic they received. I’m still on the fence when it comes to ordering one of the devices but even when I was refreshing the page I got errors and whatnot when the site went live in the UK. It looks to me as if Google should really do something about the Play Store as when the devices page went live for orders in the US there was nothing but error messages and uncertainty. You can say what you will about other retailers but I doubt that a launch has been as bad as this in a very long time. How is that that the World’s biggest presence on the web can’t launch and sell their own phones and devices properly? The Play Store looked like a boxer on his last leg’s this morning and if Google are smart, they’ll do something about it, and fast.

Why Have Google Not Said Anything?
Then there’s the whole issue of waiting and wondering when the devices were going to actually go live for orders. With people not knowing exactly when they could get their hands on the devices, people were lying in wait all day long, ready and waiting to pounce on their Web Browsers like hungry Lions. This isn’t good for any server – no matter how large – as it doesn’t take a lot to flood one with traffic. If Google came clean and were vocal about the launch then I don’t think it would have been anywhere near as bad as this, there’s no word on Google when the devices will be in stock and some of you out there are still waiting on confirmation thanks to massive errors with Google Wallet. For a company that owns and runs their own social network, they don’t seem to know how to use it very well.

Did You Get One?
This is perhaps the most pressing question of all, did you get your hands on one of these Nexus devices? If you did, let us know what it was and how your experience was!


WASHINGTON: Social networking giant Facebook is reportedly testing a new feature that emits a ping sound when a user writes on your Timeline, sends you a message or invites you to an event.

“We are currently testing a sound with notifications,” a Facebook spokesperson said.

“It’s only testing with a small percentage of people and it can be controlled from the Account Settings page,” the spokesperson added.

According to Mashable, the test was first spotted by a VentureBeat reporter whose profile page was among the test audience.

The writer posted a video and noted he “hates” it already.

We can assume many others will not be pleased to hear a constant stream of sound alerts, the report said.


Pitched as a browser for searching and browsing fast, with accelerated page loading, adjectives like “quick” and “speed” gave me the impression I was in for a Web-based speed record. That was not to be the case. I experienced sticky page scrolling at the image-heavy CNN website compared to scrolling on the stock browser.
Some of my earliest memories of smartphones are of the hassles involved with getting bookmarks loaded across devices. Why was it that Web properties thought — and some still think — you needed different information at your desk from what you wanted on the road? The issue has never been properly addressed — until now, maybe.

Google’s Chrome browser could claim to rectify this perennial problem by syncing viewed pages across devices. I decided to take a good look.

What Is It?

Google’s Chrome browser product promises the holy grail: that you can open up a Web page on one device, say your desktop, and then move over to your Ice Cream Sandwich or higher-OS Chrome app-installed tablet — and continue looking at the same page.

Does it work? I spent a day with it and the short answer is yes, it does. I was able to read pages alternating between both my PC Chrome browser and my tablet. Goal to Google.

The long answer, however is this: You’ve got to make sure that both devices are set up properly and that you’re signed-in to both with the same Google ID.

You’ve also got to drill way down into the depths of the respective browser’s settings. Then you’ve got to read help pages that don’t appear to correspond to current versions.

You also have to remember that it’s not only development that’s done by teams who don’t necessarily talk to each other. So is Help Page writing.

Still, it did work. I could flip from one device to the other.

Comparing It to the Desktop Chrome Browser

Google pitches Chrome as being a browser for your devices that’s just like the one on your PC. After the relative joy of discovering Web page sync worked, I was disappointed to find that the Chrome Web Store was missing on the Android version.

The Chrome Web Store, for the uninitiated, is a set of plug-ins that Google confusingly calls “apps.” They include RSS readers and TV feeds among others, and they are neat ways to get content into the browser.

The lack of Chrome Web Store is not the only thing that makes Chrome for Android distinctly unlike the Web browsers on my computer; there’s also its conspicuous lack of Flash player.

Missing Flash is a reason to consider other Android browsers out there, including Opera and Dolphin products. Although — giving Google the benefit of the doubt — Adobe’s Flash video standard is on its way out at the mobile level.

Comparing It to Other Browsers

Speed is another area where Chrome for Android hiccupped. Pitched as a browser for searching and browsing fast, with accelerated page loading, adjectives like “quick” and “speed” gave me the impression I was in for a Web-based speed record. That was not to be the case. I experienced sticky page scrolling at the image-heavy CNN website compared to scrolling on the stock browser.

A perusal of Google’s Chrome for Android Known Issues Web Page came up with documented laggy scroll and zoom issues with heavy and dynamic content.

Not Quite There Yet

I desperately wanted to love Chrome for Android, but it was not to be. The sticky page scrolling on its own was enough for me to drop it after a day. My instincts tell me that this is simply an immature product, though, with star potential.